Monday, December 16, 2019

Financial Statement Analysis (ACC 205: Principles of Accounting, June 17, 2019).


Financial Statement Analysis
Company Overview
            As society gravitates away from junk food and sugary drinks, the future financial strength of the beverage industry may experience lower performance. Is the beverage market already experiencing a decline? For both 2016 and 2017, the beverage industry made Forbes’ list of the fifteen least profitable industries (Biery, 2017). Coca- Cola and PepsiCo are forefront leaders of this industry. Although not a direct rival of Coca-Cola or PepsiCo, Dr. Pepper is a steady growing contender. Is it a financially sound decision for investors to buy into this industry? By analyzing financial statements of three of the largest companies in this industry, one can gain deeper insight into the stability and profitability of the industry to make wise investment decisions.
            Currently based in Atlanta, the Coca-Cola Company began in 1892 and is one of the largest corporations in America. Coca-Cola continues to lead the beverage industry as the most popular beverage choice globally (Coca-Cola, 2018). Some of Coca-Cola’s products are Diet Coke, Minute Maid juices, Sprite, Powerade and Peak Tea, Bacardi mixers, energy drinks, and bottled water (Coca-Cola, 2019).
            Started in 1902, PepsiCo Inc. is based in New York. PepsiCo’s four main divisions are Frito- Lay, PepsiCo Beverages, Quaker Foods, and PepsiCo International (Moroney, 2005). Some of PepsiCo’s twenty-two brand products are are Mountain Dew, Pepsi, Aquafina water, tea, Gatorade, Tropicana juice, Lay’s chips, and Doritos. PepsiCo also owns Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, and Kentucky Fried Chicken (PepsiCo, 2019). PepsiCo reports around a billion dollars in sales from the company’s brands annually (Moroney, 2005).  PepsiCo is a strong competitor of the Coca-Cola Company reporting over 66 billion dollars in revenue (PepsiCo, 2019).
            Dr. Pepper, based in Texas, is thirteenth in the beverage industry based on sales (Beverage, 2019). Dr Pepper was created in the 1880s and claims that the original soda is manufactured today with variations of added flavors and different sweeteners. Some of Dr Pepper products are 7-Up, All Sport, IBC root beer, Clamato, Snapple, Hawaiian Punch, and Yoo-hoo (Dr Pepper, 2019).
Ratio Analysis
            The current ratio provides a view of the company’s capital. The current ratio is calculated by dividing the total current assets by the total current liabilities. The higher the current ratio reflects  the company’s ability to repay short-term liabilities (Vliet, n.d.). If the current ratio is less than one, then the business will not have enough capital to cover debt. If the current ratio is over two then a business can comfortably cover liabilities when due (Mitchell, 2019). The current ratio for each company is calculated from data located on the year-end balance sheets (Appendix A). PepsiCo has the highest current ratio at 3.89 for 2017 and 3.48 for 2016. Dr Pepper’s score for 2016 is 1.28 and 1.33 for 2015. Coca-Cola has the lowest current ratio at 1.18 for 2017 and 1.17 for 2016. While these scores reflect that PepsiCo has the most capital, each company has enough capital to repay incurred debts.
            The quick ratio measures a company’s ability to repay short-term debt (Mitchell, 2019). The quick ratio is calculated by subtracting the inventory from the current assets and dividing the total by the current liabilities. Like the current ratio, the higher the quick ratio, the greater the company’s ability to cover short-term debts. The information to calculate the quick ratio is on the balance sheets (Appendix A). Coca-Cola has the highest quick ratio at 4.52 for December 2017 and 5.01 for January 2017. PepsiCo scored 3.75 for 2017 and 3.35 for 2016. Dr Pepper scored 1.25 for 2016 and 1.29 for 2015.
            A business can use the gross profit margin percentage (GPMP) to measure financial health and efficiency. If one company’s GPMP is better than its competitor, then it means the company is operating more efficiently than the competitor. If the GPMP is lower, then company operations may require adjustments.  If the GPMP remains stable over time, then the company operations are performing well. If the GPMP fluctuates drastically, then this indicates a major problem within the company functions (Gleeson, 2019). The GPMP is calculated by subtracting the cost of goods sold from the revenue and dividing that amount by the total revenue, then multiplying by one hundred. The information to calculate the GPMP is located on the income statements (Appendix B). All three companies have consistent GPMP, however, Coca-Cola shows a slight decreasing variance at 39% for 2015, 38% for 2016, and 36% for 2017.Pepsico shows a slight increase at 54% for 2015, and 55% for both 2016 and 2017. Dr. Pepper remains stable at 59% for 2014, 2015, and 2016. Once again, all three companies have a stable GPMP, but Dr. Pepper’s score is the most consistent. Dr Pepper has the lowest capital of all three companies.
            The inventory turnover ratio is calculated by dividing the cost of goods sold divided by average inventory. To obtain the average inventory one adds the beginning inventory and ending inventories and divides the total by two. The inventory turnover ratio measures how efficiently a company sells inventory. The inventory is found on the balance sheets and the cost of goods sold is located on the income statements (Appendix A and B). The inventory turnover ratio for Coca-Cola for 2017 is 17.0. The ratio for Dr Pepper for 2016 is 12.6. The ratio for PepsiCo for 2016 to 2017 is 10.2, but this number may be lower because the data on the balance sheet spans two years versus the 12 months accounted for Dr Pepper and Coca-Cola.
            The account receivable turnover ratio is calculated by dividing the net credit sales by the average accounts receivable. A higher ratio is favorable as this indicates the receivables are turned to cash assets quickly. Since the total credit sales are missing from the company financial reports, the net revenue (Appendix B)  is used to calculate this ratio for company comparison purposes. Accounts receivable figures are found on the balance sheets (Appendix A). The accounts receivable turnover ratio for Coca Cola for 2017 is 8.6. The ratio for Pepsi for 2017 is 9.0 and the ratio for Dr Pepper for 2016 is 10.0.
Comparison of Accounting Methods         
            The first-in, first-out (FIFO) inventory method assumes that the oldest inventory is sold before the most recently purchased inventory. The last-in, first-out (LIFO) method sells the most recently purchased first and bases the final inventory on the oldest costs (Miller-Nobles, Mattison, Matsumura, 2018). Companies use this inventory method when purchasing prices increase. A business using the LIFO method will pay less tax on the net income. Arguably, LIFO is an unfair advantage for businesses, but this method accounts for inflation and the additional funds a business needs to replace the sold inventory. Since Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Dr Pepper produce and sells consumable goods with a set expiration date, the companies use the FIFO method. The FIFO method maximizes profits and reduces the amount written off as an expense for these companies.
            Small non-public businesses use the direct write-off method to expense out uncollectible debt (Miller-Nobles, Mattison, Matsumara, 2018). The direct write-off method does not follow the matching principle and is not acceptable per the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Using the direct write-off method, a business can write-off debt in any period. Therefore, the revenue from the transaction is recorded in one period and the bad debt expense recorded later. This lapse can create an overstatement or understatement of the net income for those periods. The Allowance method follows the matching principle method by transferring the bad debt into an expense account within the same period as the sales revenue from the transaction. Corporations  and large business use the allowance method for bad-debt because it is the preferred method per accounting standards (Miller-Nobles, Mattison, Matsumara, 2018). Since Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Dr Pepper are all corporations, these businesses use the allowance method.
            The three methods used of depreciation are the straight-line, units-of-production, and double-declining-balance. The straight-line method divides and applies the depreciation amount equally for each year. The units-of-production method depreciates by units. The amount of depreciation recognized in a certain period varies as the depreciation is determined by usage rather than time. The double-declining-balance method is an accelerated depreciation method. The largest depreciation occurs in the first period after purchase and then lessens subsequently (Miller-Nobles, Mattison, & Matsumura, 2018). As manufacturers, these companies would primarily use the units-of-production method to account for depreciation of equipment.
Recommendation
            If an investor analyzes the financial statements released by Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Dr Pepper, each company reflects strong numbers. With a few calculations one can see that each company has enough assets to cover debts and have reasonable turnover rates. While most of the calculations are overall higher for Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, Dr Pepper has consistent numbers. Since Dr Pepper is only the thirteenth largest beverage company according to sales, there is more growth potential. Dr Pepper is the only company that held a stable GPMP of 59% for three years. This shows that even though the company has fewer assets than the competition, the company is using its resources effectively. While any of these three companies will likely produce profit for an investor, Dr Pepper is the personal recommendation.

References
Beverage Industry. (2019) The top 100 beverage companies of 2018.110 (6) 6, 30-34. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=6&sid=1fcd7f28-7ea0-4681-a334-b586e340f640%40sdc-v-sessmgr01
Biery, M. (2017, September 24). These industries generate the lowest profit margins. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/sageworks/2017/09/24/these-industries-generate-the-lowest-profit-margins/#5c682458f49d
Coca-Cola. (2019, June 16). Wiki. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola Company (2018) In Salem Press Encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=1fcd7f28-7ea0-4681-a334-b586e340f640%40sdc-v-sessmgr01&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=87994579&db=ers
Dr Pepper Snapple Group. (2019). Our brands. Retrieved from https://www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com/brands
Gleeson, P. (2019, March 1). How to calculate gross profit margin percentage. Chron. Retrieved from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/calculate-gross-profit-margin-percentage-4133.html
How to calculate inventory turnover. (2019, April 27). Wiki . https://www.wikihow.com/Calculate-Inventory-Turnover
Miller-Nobles, T. L., Mattison, B. L., & Matsumura, E. M. (2018). Horngren’s accounting (12th ed.). Retrieved from https://pearson.com
Mitchell, C. (2019, May 8). How to calculate financial rations of performance. Chron. Retrieved from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/calculate-financial-ratios-performance-52697.html
Moroney, R. (2005, December 2). PepsiCo. Business Insights: Global. Retrieved from http://bi.galegroup.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/global/article/GALE|A140659191?u=ashford
PepsiCo. (2019). In Salem Press Encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=3&sid=424a8739-2fd6-4b61-9fc8-52196d01ae9b%40sessionmgr4007&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=87996580&db=ers
Vliet, V. (n.d.). Current ratio. Retrieved from https://www.toolshero.com/financial-management/current-ratio/




No comments:

Post a Comment